The Birth Place Lab has developed novel instruments to improve the evaluation of maternity care including:
The Birth Place Research Quality Index (ResQu Index)
Families, doctors, midwives and policymakers often make decisions about where to plan a birth based on their understanding of the published research. However, they sometimes draw different conclusions about the safety of home, birth center or hospital birth, even when they read the same studies. This is, in part, because there has been no standardized way to assess the quality of the available studies. The Birth Place Research Quality Index (ResQu Index) was designed to provide a reliable instrument to rate the quality of primary research that examines the impact of place of birth to maternal and newborn outcomes.
An international, multi-disciplinary panel of experts developed the ResQu Index. It is a reliable and practical tool that can be used to rate the quality of research that examines the effects of birth place on health outcomes. The components of the index meet best practice standards for critical appraisal tools.
Click below to receive a copy of the research article, tool, or lay summary.Request ResQu Index
Tools to measure respectful maternity care
Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making scale (MADM)
The Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making scale (MADM) is a scale developed to assess women’s experiences with maternity care.
It is a reliable and valid instrument, presently MADM version 1.0 is the most recent version and should be used for all new studies.
Vedam S, Stoll K, Martin K, et al. The Mother’s Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. PLOS ONE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171804.
See “Requesting MADM and MOR” below for information on requesting a copy.
Mothers on Respect Index (MOR)
The Mothers on Respect index (MOR) is a scale developed to assess the nature of respectful patient-provider interactions and their impact on a person’s sense of comfort, behavior, and perceptions of racism or discrimination. The MOR index is a reliable, patient-informed quality and safety indicator that can be applied across jurisdictions to assess the nature of provider-patient relationships, and access to person-centered care. (Vedam et al, 2017) It is a consumer driven, reliable and valid instrument that has been administered to women in Canada and the US (see paper).
Vedam S, Stoll K, Rubashkin N, et al. The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth. Social Science and Medicine: Population Health. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.005.
Requesting MADM and MOR
This MADM scale and MOR index are free for use in academic settings, however for any study carried out by a commercial group or if the study is wholly or partially supported by a commercial organization a fee may be payable. This fee is dependent on a variety of factors, for information please contact the Birth Place Lab here.
Any funds generated through the copyright arrangement are used exclusively to support the ongoing work of the Birth Place Lab.
For academic studies, there is no charge, but a User Agreement is required for each study. Please click below to complete the download request form.Request MADM Request MOR
Provider Attitudes to Planned Home Birth (PAPHB) Scale
The Birth Place Lab has developed 3 scales that can measure provider attitudes toward planned home birth. These scales, originally developed in 2009, have been used by researchers internationally including Australia, Ireland, Israel, Jamaica and the United States. There are three versions available: PAPHB, designed for Certified Nurse Midwives; PAPHB-M (multidisciplinary) which is designed for use across health disciplines; and PAPHB-I (international) which can compare attitudes among midwives from different countries.
Vedam S, Stoll K, Acker J, White S. & Schummers L. (2009). Nurse midwives’ experiences with planned home birth: impact on attitudes and practice. Birth. 36(4):274-82. PMID: 20002419Request PAPHB